The Snowman (2017) Review: Horribly, Hilariously, and Hopelessly Misconceived

The Snowman (2017) Review: Horribly, Hilariously, and Hopelessly Misconceived

There’s no point in sugar coating it, The Snowman is an absolute disaster of a movie. It’s a tonally confused and at times downright incompetent mess. The sad thing is that so many talented filmmakers were involved in this disaster. People who should know better and in the case of director Tomas Alfredson—Let The Right One In, Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy—one person who has already essentially apologized for the disaster. This lone silver lining is that the film is so ludicrously misconceived and out of control that it is still pretty damn entertaining. Just not necessarily in the ways that the filmmaker intended.

*Please note: this article contains spoilers*

The Snowman (2017) Review: Horribly, Hilariously, and Hopelessly Misconceived 2
Genevieve O’Reilly in The Snowman (2017) – image via Universal Pictures

So, this is one of those great detective vs. sick serial killer tales. In this case the detective is Harry Hole—real name—and burned out middle-aged alcoholic played by Michael Fassbender who doesn’t embody any of those adjectives. The serial killer likes to leave snowmen behind in his crime scenes, either looking at the corpse or incorporated into the crime—like placing a severed head on a snowman. This is because when he was a child he watched his mother commit suicide slowly after building a snowman. So frowny face snowmen are key to the killer’s crimes, in fact he even sends the detective in charge of the case a letter with a snowman sketch to kick off the investigation. Once again, this is the actual plot. It has not been exaggerated. Also featured are a brilliant detective protégée portrayed by Rebecca Ferguson, a sleazy businessman played by JK Simmons, a spurned ex played by Charlotte Gainsbourg, and a second unrelated alcoholic detective played by Val Kilmer. So many talented actors, so few scenes actually worthy of their talent.

The Snowman (2017) Review: Horribly, Hilariously, and Hopelessly Misconceived 1
Rebecca Ferguson (right) and J.K. Simmons (left) in The Snowman (2017) – image via Universal Pictures

There are a couple of high points in the film. Specifically, the Norwegian setting is filled with foreboding snowscapes that make for fantastic establishing shots at atmosphere. That’s about it in terms of what went right. In terms of what went wrong? How about everything else. The plot is all over the place with huge gaping holes that don’t make sense. Logic is out the window. The police use a strange and bulky crime-fighting tablet for reasons never fully explained—nor is it even necessary. The killers use cartoonishly complex implements of death for their victims. The actors are all wasted, often having so little to do with the focus of the story—I’m looking at you JK Simmons and Toby Jones—that it doesn’t make sense why they are even there. Val Kilmer’s entire performance has been so poorly redubbed that Spaghetti Western sound crews would be embarrassed. There’s very little that works. Most of it went horribly wrong and embarrassingly so.

The Snowman (2017) Review: Horribly, Hilariously, and Hopelessly Misconceived
Val Kilmer in The Snowman (2017) – image via Universal Pictures

Fortunately, The Snowman fails so hard and so often that it becomes rather entertaining. You may not quite understand what’s happening in the story or why, but you’ll always be excited to see how it’ll get worse and more convoluted. Scenes like Chloe Sevigny’s twin showing up just in time for her identical sister to be murdered get big laughs from audiences. The snowman murder set pieces never cease to be enjoyably goofy. The entire Val Kilmer section is so insane that it’s sure to be isolated into YouTube clips and studied by bad movie lovers for months. This big budget adaptation of a best selling thriller might not exactly please those excited to see a beloved airport paperback brought to life, but it will make those will a sweet tooth for irony giggle with delight. That’s something.

The Snowman (2017) Review: Horribly, Hilariously, and Hopelessly Misconceived 3
Jonas Karlsson and Michael Fassbender in The Snowman (2017) – image via Universal Pictures

It is a shame that this movie turned out so poorly though. It’s been six longs years since Tomas Alfredson’s Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy and the filmmaker seemed so promising at the time that there was a certain level of anticipation for his follow up. Obviously he spent years lining up a project and big names were excited to sign onto his latest creation. Then this mess happens. Afredson claims that he didn’t have enough time to shoot everything he needed explaining the gaps and awkward editing by virtue of the fact that post production was essentially a salvage job. That’s not an excuse. He still made a bad movie despite having the most filmmaking resources at his disposal in his entire career. However, it at least suggests that the Let The Right One In director will be able to bounce back from this. After all, compared to The Snowman absolutely anything that he does next will feel like a return to form. Even if his next movie is bad it’s unlikely to be a disaster on this scale.

Liked this article and want to read more like it? Check out Phil’s take on Blade Runner 2049Happy Death Day, and It! He also had a chance to sit down with Guillermo Del Toro. Check out his interview here!

Never miss when new CGM articles go out by following us on Twitter and Facebook!

Want to see more videos? Subscribe to our YouTube channel and check out the First 15 – Marvel vs. Capcom: Infinite and Cuphead!

Don’t forget to tune in every Friday the Pixels & Ink Podcast to hear the latest news, previews, and in-depth game discussions!

CGMagazine is Canada’s premiere comics and gaming magazine. Subscribe today to get the best of CGM delivered right to your door! Never miss when a new issue goes live by subscribing to our newsletter! Signing up gives you exclusive entry into our contest pool. Sign up once, you’ll have a chance to win! Sign up today!

Assassin’s Creed Movie Review Round-Up

Assassin's Creed Movie Review Round-Up

Who could have expected this? The embargo on the forthcoming Assassin’s Creed movie has broken, and the curse of the videogame movie continues. At press time, the film stands at 16% on Rotten Tomatoes (with an average score of 3.8/10) and 37/100 on Metacritic. The Rotten Tomatoes “Critic’s Consensus” is clever and evocative, as per usual, giving the movie props for its cast, but still calls it a “joylessly overplotted slog.”

If you’re still going to see it — either out of morbid curiosity or because you liked director Justin Kurzel’s Macbeth, also starring Michael Fassbender and Marion Cotillard — you should at least know what you’re getting into. A review from The Verge’s Adi Robertson has the highest score, recorded by Metacritic as a 68/100. Robertson writes:

“Assassin’s Creed’s creators have the courage to always take themselves seriously, even when they’re working with material that sounds fundamentally silly. There’s no great leap of faith in Assassin’s Creed, but a surprising amount of the time, it at least finds steady footing.”

The harshest scored review comes from Slant Magazine’s Aaron Ricco, who gives it 0.5 stars out of four, (or 12/100 in Metacritic-speak). Ricco writes:

“In splitting its focus between two timelines, Assassin’s Creed ends up with both blurry action that often looks digitally faked and a fractious plot that’s stuck over-explaining itself. It fails both as a science-fiction thriller and historical action film.”

My beloved AV Club also comes through with a middling review from Jesse Hassenger, who gave the film a C-. Don’t worry Ubisoft, as I told myself numerous times in my college career, a C is still technically a passing grade!

“[Fassbender and Cotillard] have such adult intensity that their participation in a juvenile fantasy becomes a source of bizarre fascination—for a little while, anyway. Assassin’s Creed pushes their charisma to the limits, then stabs it bloodlessly and jumps off a building.”

Peter Bradshaw, of The Guardian, said the film achieved “transcendental boredom,” giving it one star out of five. Bradshaw’s review is a scathing, well-articulated takedown with shades of latter-day Roger Ebert. I highly recommend reading it, especially if you’re into film criticism as an art form.

“Marion Cotillard says in her doom-laden accent: “Prepare the animus”; and it sounds worryingly like “Prepare the enemas”. There is no animus in this film, however. It’s rare to see a film quite so lacking in animus.”

This being a videogame movie, plenty of reviews either deride the film as feeling less authentic than its digital counterpart or recommend viewers just go play the games instead. The now-standard resentment film critics have towards the games industry remains on full display, but there are recurring patterns in even the tech-friendly reviews — Assassin’s Creed has underdeveloped characters and overdeveloped action, resulting in a film that isn’t worth now-inflated ticket prices.